1. Flood Alleviation Scheme, Banbury
NCE Flood Management Conference 4 Dec 2013
Richard Harding CEng MICE
Steven Lee CEng MICE C.WEM MCIWEM MAPM
(CPC Project Services LLP)
Banbury FAS Project Executive
Banbury FAS Project Manager
1
2. Banbury FAS: Background
Banbury has a long history of flooding. In April
1998 125 residential & 35 commercial properties
were flooded causing over £12.5m of damage –
the flood was estimated as a 1:100 year event.
The newly constructed scheme protects Banbury
against a 1:200 year fluvial flood reducing the risk
of flooding to 441 residential and 73 commercial
properties bringing benefits of c.£100m.
Total scheme cost c.£18.6m. The scheme has
been funded by the Thames Regional Flood &
Coastal Committee and 3rd party contributions of
over £3m from Cherwell DC, Thames Water,
Network Rail and Prodrive.
2
3. Banbury FAS: Options
Historic flood review
Spiceball gauging station records
Historic record review
Rainfall hydrographs
Options included
do nothing/maintain
improve conveyance
local defences
diversion channel/tunnel
upstream flood storage
3
4. Banbury FAS: Key facts
The main upstream embankment is 2.85km long with a maximum height of
4.5m. The flood storage area created behind the embankment is capable of
holding over 3million m3 of flood water in a 1:200yr event equivalent to 1200
Olympic size swimming pools.
Over 200,000m3 of material was dug from the field on the opposite side of the
canal to construct the embankment.
The 2 flow control structures are identical, contain no moving parts and
incorporate the main spillways.
We also raised a 860m long section of the A361 to ensure it floods no more
frequently than at present.
At Wildmere we have constructed a 400m long earth embankment: at
Tramways we have built a combination of earth embankments and low level
sheet pile walls whilst at Moorfield Brook we had previously constructed a
pumping station.
4
6. Banbury FAS: Design challenges
Client brief – simple, passive system.
Legal advice was to negotiate alongside a CPO. First CPO was issued in 2004
using ISIS model. Objections received from both landowners and statutory
consultees – took several years to resolve statutory objections.
Changes in government priority scoring system in 2006 meant scheme wasn’t
funded. Public Inquiry was cancelled at our request as certainty of funding is a
prerequisite.
Funding constraints - alternate funding sources/partnership funding confirmed.
New CPO issued in 2007 using new modelling (Tuflow). Objections again
received plus 3 subsequent CPO amendments needed.
Public Inquiry in May 2010. Decision on 31 Oct 2010. Last possible day for
2011 start on site. Impact on clearance and mobilisation.
Climate change.
Managing public expectations/interest throughout.
6
7. Banbury FAS: Material win areas
Reviewed 8 potential local win areas – generally
‘raised areas’ upstream of Banbury
We clearly weren’t the first to recognise their
potential as extensive archaeology remains and now
many vital as cattle refuges in flood events
Archaeology included Bronze Age settlement
patterns, British Romano farmstead settlements with
Saxon farmsteads overlaying these.
Medieval ridge and furrow agricultural field patterns
throughout the area
Within the Cropredy Bridge Battlefield site from the
English Civil War.
But key issue was 2nd World War anti-aircraft
battery!
7
8. Banbury FAS: Ideal design of control structure
• Flow control structure should throttle river flows to 38m3/s
• Control of discharge should be automatic (no attendance)
• No reliance on power supplies or remote operation
• No moving parts
• Minimised impact on upstream landowners
8
9. Banbury FAS: Design innovation: double-baffle
orifice
•
Uniquely adapted from irrigation schemes
•
Described in textbooks
•
Never before used in UK
Double-baffle orifice layout and
performance (after Bos, 1989)
Battery of double-baffle orifice devices
(Neyrpic, 1971)
9
10. Banbury FAS: Double-baffle orifice design – how
it works
Low head, with
crump weir
controlling the flow
Medium head, with flow
controlled by the
upstream baffle
High head, with flow
controlled by the
downstream baffle
10
11. Banbury FAS: Model testing
The graph shows the
resulting rating curve for
each flow control
structure
Head
Design developed by
physical model
testing at HR
Wallingford
Flow
11
12. Banbury FAS: Benefits of innovative design
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Simple design
Passes constant flow
Increased reliability (no moving parts)
Increased life of asset
Reduced operation & maintenance costs
Requires no operation during flood
Increased sustainability (no energy requirements)
Reduced capital costs
Reduced carbon footprint over the life of the asset
All benefits of passive design
12
15. Banbury FAS: Challenges
Availability of material
Archaeology
Working in four locations
Landowner requirements
Minimising winter working
Minimising waste – 97% recycling
A361 amendments to road width
Cropredy Festival
Managing local expectations
15
16. Banbury FAS: Flood storage reservoir borrow pit
Main Borrow Pit located West side of
Oxford Canal
Clay from Borrow Pit suitable for
Embankment
Pre-Construction anticipated using
Weathered ‘Brown’ Clay
Selection Found to be difficult + rock
lenses
During Construction Unweathered ‘Blue
Clay’ found to be Suitable
.
16
17. Banbury FAS: Archaeology
Pre-historic flint tool finds in the RA6
Bronze Age settlement patterns
British Romano farmstead settlements
Saxon farmsteads overlying the British
Romano settlements
Medieval ridge and furrow agricultural
field patterns
Within the Cropredy Bridge Battlefield
site from the English Civil War.
Dummy 2nd World War anti-aircraft
battery
.
17
21. Banbury FAS: A361 Road Raising
860m of existing road raised to
ensure flooding and road closure no
more frequent than existing
Culverts installed to ensure
balanced water levels either side of
road during flood events
Two local authority boundaries
21
23. Banbury FAS: Tramways
Protects Industrial Estate & Football
Ground from Flooding
210m Long Sheet Pile Walls with
Concrete Capping Beam
100m Long Earth Embankment 2m
High
24
27. Banbury FAS: Wider scheme benefits
Proposed Country Park in win
area, working with Cherwell
DC
12 hectares of new BAP
habitat including wet and dry
woodland/scrub planting
3 river realignments
incorporating new ponds
New hedgerows and trees
(planting 3 times more than
were cut down)
New & reinstated meadows
Improved footpath access
27