HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...
UKSG 2014 Breakout Session - Open access comes of age: implementing open access policies at UCL, Manchester and beyond
1. Open Access comes of age:
implementing Open Access policies at
UCL, University of Manchester and
beyond
Catherine Sharp, UCL
Helen Dobson, University of Manchester
Rob Johnson, Research Consulting
UKSG Conference 14th & 15th April 2014
2. Open access at UCL
Catherine Sharp
Open Access Funding Manager
catherine.sharp@ucl.ac.uk
3. Research at UCL
• c4,800 staff & postdocs
• c4,500 research students
• at least 9,000 research publications p.a.
Open access at UCL
• Open access “underpins UCL‟s research mission”
• c20,000 full-text in UCL Discovery
• 4 million downloads
• UCL open access fund –
choice of Gold/Green is “academic decision”
• UCL Press
4. 345 papers in 2012-13
target 693
achieved 753 (March 2013) (109%)
projected 798 (115%)
20 27 25 26
39
50 55 52 51
85
68
158
6 0 2 1
0
0
1 1
15
33
38
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
RCUK Green
RCUK Gold
Prepayment figures for
Feb/March
incomplete, pending
publisher returns.
„Committed‟ figure
includes known pre-
paid APCs; to be
confirmed in publisher
returns
12. • Different publisher & funder policies
• Authors need a very responsive, personal service, with minimal form-filling
• Licences need explaining
BUT
• Bureaucratic publisher systems, with confusing options
• Invoice payments cumbersome
• We need information directly from author: funder references, grant holders
SO
• We reduce admin for authors and influence publishers to build better systems
• Keep abreast of publishers‟ policies and funders‟ requirements
• Manage budgets effectively
Complications and challenges
14. Open Access at Manchester
Helen Dobson
Research Services Librarian
University of Manchester Library
15. Member of
Russell Group
Founded
in 1824
Largest
single-site
UK
university
4 faculties
26 schools &
institutes
20 cross-
discipline
centres
4000+
research staff
3500+
PGRs
4500
research
papers01
3/
17. The University Library Open Access Pump-Priming Project
• Goal 1 Introduce a change of culture to prepare researchers for the
launch of Open Access policies from RCUK and other funders
• Goal 2 Establish structures and processes to support the new
RCUK and Wellcome Trust policies from April 2013
• Goal 3 Implement technical developments required to underpin the
processing and reporting of Open Access activity within the University
• Goal 4 Pilot payment of Article Processing Charges (APCs) to
support publishing of research articles in Gold OA journals
31. Recommendations
• Support service on campus
• Engage in community-wide problem solving
• Share data & experience
RCUK OA Policy compliance achieved
32. Title for text slide 24 point
with 1 line spacing after
Sub-title 18pt with 1 line spacing after
Main copy size 14 point
Line spacing 1.2 for all text
•Bullet 1 use standard bullet
- Bullet 2 use for secondary bullet
Thank you
uml.openaccess@manchester.ac.uk
34. THE ROLE OF INTERMEDIARIES
IN OPEN ACCESS
Systems and processes
associated with the
payment of APCs are sub-
optimal…
…No clear consensus on
the role of intermediaries
might most effectively play
and how.
18 months ago…
But
36. OPEN ACCESS AT THE
UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM
2001 – Repository
established
2007 – University
publication fund
established
2009 – Institutional
Open Access Policy
adopted
37. USING AN INTERMEDIARY
Jan 2013 – Adopted
Open Access Key as
APC intermediary
May 2013 – OAK
service migrated to
JISC APC
April 2014 – End of
JISC APC Pilot
43. COLLECTION OF METADATA –
INSTITUTIONAL PERSPECTIVE
Capture data in
standardised form
Intermediary
Pub
Pub
Pub
Pub
Pub
Pub
Pub
Pub
Pub
ReportingReporting
Management
reporting
Accounting
transactions
Reporting to
funders
Authors
Reporting
Collect any
missing data
eg
funders, licenses
(If not obtained via pre-
approval process)
44. HOW CAN INTERMEDIARIES
HELP?
1.Transaction management – including publisher
prepayments
2.Improved author experience (but perhaps not yet?)
3.Data, data, data
• Streamlining processes for managing compliance
• Promoting adoption of standard metadata forms and
unique identifiers
Chart experience of University of NottinghamStrong advocate of OAPolicy committed the University to meet the costs of OA publication
Chart experience of University of NottinghamWhy the change of direction?COSTSubscriptions budget of c£4mGone from spending £250k/year on APCs, to forecasting £1m+ on top of subscriptionsNot that UoN couldn’t fund it, but opportunity cost too great – vs. studentships, equipment, researchRebalancing of costs away from teaching-focussed to research intensive institutions
Chart experience of University of NottinghamWhy the change of direction?COSTSubscriptions budget of c£4mGone from spending £250k/year on APCs, to forecasting £1m+ on top of subscriptionsNot that UoN couldn’t fund it, but opportunity cost too great – vs. studentships, equipment, researchRebalancing of costs away from teaching-focussed to research intensive institutions
Number of different potential payment models, needs will between different publishers and institutions
Need to standardise this to be able to establish what’s going on