This document discusses inequality in Scotland. It begins by outlining changing views of inequality, from the neo-liberal view that inequality naturally occurs and benefits economic growth, to more recent evidence that excessive inequality can stifle growth and mobility. The document then analyzes drivers of inequality like globalization and policy changes. It provides data on rising earnings inequality in Scotland since the 1980s and compares Scotland's levels of inequality internationally. The document concludes that while fiscal policy can help reduce inequality, achieving more equal levels like Nordic countries would require changes to pre-tax market incomes as well.
2. Changing Understanding of Inequality
• The neo-liberal view
– Kuznets Curve - as an economy develops, a natural cycle of inequality
occurs, driven by market forces. These initially increase inequality, and
then decrease it.
– “Trickle down” economics – those at the bottom of the income
distribution benefit from gains made at the top (Okun’s “leaky bucket”)
• Growing opposition …
– The Spirit Level: Wilkinson and Pickett
• More equal societies have better economic, social and health outcomes
– Capital in the 21st Century: Picketty
• increasing inequality of income and wealth since 1970s, particularly
• returns from capital are likely to grow faster than the economy itself, and faster than the
owners of that wealth are likely to be able to spend it
– Some industries (e.g. financial services) able to capture rents, increasing
top-end incomes
3. Changing Views of Inequality
• There is now widespread acceptance that current levels of
inequality are excessive (IMF/World Bank/ILO)
• Instrumental arguments in favour of containing/reducing it
– health inequalities, equality of opportunity,
• e.g. Ostry, Berg and Tsangarides (2014) - IMF
– “it is an empirical question whether redistribution in practice is pro- or
anti-growth”
– “more unequal societies tend to redistribute more”
– “lower net inequality is robustly correlated with faster and more
durable growth, for a given level of redistribution”
– “redistribution appears generally benign in terms of its impact on
growth; only in extreme cases is there some evidence that it may have
direct negative effects on growth”
4. Changing Policy Environment
• IMF (2013): ‘higher inequality seems to lower growth’
• OECD (2011): ‘inequality can stifle social mobility, making it
harder for talented and hard-working people to get the
rewards they deserve’.
• Scottish Government (2013): ‘Scotland is currently part of a
UK economic model and society which is one of the most
unequal in the OECD. Such patterns of inequality will
continue to have a negative impact on growth and
prosperity over the long-term.’
5. Thinking about the determinants of inequality
• Economic forces
– Globalisation
– Technological change
• Intended redistributive policy actions
– Tax and benefits
• Unintended consequences of policy
– Regulation
– Prices
• Forthcoming paper - Inequality in Scotland: New Perspectives by
David Bell, David Eiser and Mike McGoldrick - published at
www.davidhumeinstitute.com on Monday 20 October
6. Measuring Inequality in Scotland
• Wealth or Income?
– Before taxes and benefits (gross)
– After taxes and benefits (net)
• Individual or Household?
– Affected by housing market/household formation
• Time period?
– Hourly/Weekly/Annual/Lifetime
8. Another approach – Lorenz Curve/Gini Coefficient
Top2% account for
12% of earnings
Gini Coefficient proportional
to area under 45 degree line
Gini (earned income Scot = 0.4)
Bottom 34% account for
12% of earnings
12. Earnings inequality: drivers
• 1980s and early 1990s:
– Deindustrialisation and technological change: ‘hollowing out’ of labour
market
– Financial deregulation
– Labour market deregulation and TU decline, particularly in private sector
– Reduction in top tax rates
• Late 1990s and since:
– Continuing technological change and globalisation
– Introduction of minimum wage – moderating rise
– Increase in PT and temporary working, zero-hours contracts,
underemployment
– Increase in self-employment
– Relatively poor performance of young in labour markets
13. Big rise in household inequality occurred in 1980s;
inequality in Scotland similar to rest of GB outside London…
14. International comparisons: inequality of household net
income high in UK….
0.5
UK 29th out of 34 OECD Countries by Gini Coefficient of Equivalised Household Disposable Income
Source: OECD 23/7/2014
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.6
Slovenia
Norway
Iceland
Denmark
Czech Republic
Finland
Slovak Republic
Belgium
Sweden
Luxembourg
Netherlands
Austria
Switzerland
Hungary
Germany
Ireland
Poland
France
RGB
Korea
Canada
Italy
Scotland
Estonia
New Zealand
Australia
Greece
Japan
Portugal
Spain
United Kingdom
Israel
United States
London
Turkey
Mexico
Chile
Gini Coefficient
15. International comparisons: gross income inequality in UK
very high, but tax-benefit system fairly redistributive
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
KOR
SWIT
US
ISR
CAN
AUS
NLD
NZD
ICE
JPN
POL
EST
ESP
SWE
NOR
SLK
DEN
POR
UK
ITA
GRE
CZE
LUX
FRA
GER
SLO
AUT
BEL
FIN
IRE
Gini coefficient
Net GINI
Redistribution
18. Inequality: policy responses
• Personal taxation and benefits
– Income tax, property tax, capital gains, IHT, etc.
– Benefits: low-income, out-of-work benefits, pensions, etc.
• Labour market regulation
– E.g. min/living wage, TUs and collective bargaining, ‘flexibility’
e.g. zero-hours contracts, etc.
• Increased ‘in-kind’ spending
– Education: Attainment gap and inter-generational inequality
– Health: close link between income and health inequalities
19. How effective might fiscal policy be in influencing
net income inequality in an independent Scotland?
Change GINI
Total govt. revenue implication
(£m)
1p on basic rate -0.15% 239
1p on higher rate -0.07% 4
1p on SRIT (basic, higher, additional) -0.24% 232
Additional rate threshold reduced to £100,000 -0.12% -26
Increase rates of IS/ JSA by 10% -0.15% -50
Council tax revaluation -0.02% 5
Council tax rise of 10% 0.03% 137
Increase basic and 30-hour elements of WTC 10% -0.07% -61
22. Conclusions (1)
• Inequality skews opportunity and limits intergenerational
mobility
• Rapid increase in earnings inequality in 80s: tech. change,
industrial decline, labour market deregulation
• Slower increase during late 90s and 2000s, mainly driven
by changes in distribution of hours worked…
• …but continued pulling away of highest earners
• Overall household net income inequality largely
unchanged since mid-1990s – tax/benefit system has
mitigated small increase in earnings inequality
• Inequality in Scotland very similar to rGB/rUK excluding
London
23. Conclusions (2)
• Inequality in UK remains high, but other countries ‘caught-up’
slightly in the 1990s and early 2000s
• Inequality is higher in Scotland than in Nordic countries not
because the UK’s tax and benefit system is much less
redistributive than the Nordics, but because the inequality of
market (pre tax and transfer) incomes is higher in Scotland
• Fiscal policy levers can help address inequality, but unlikely in
themselves to be a panacea
• Achieving Nordic levels of inequality would require a shift not
only in the tax and benefit system, but also in the distribution
of market incomes
• Inequality outlook uncertain:
– Welfare reform
– Computerisation and demand for skills
24. Thanks for your attention
• Further material:
– Bell, D.N.F. and Eiser, D. (2013) ‘Inequality in Scotland: trends, drivers,
and implications for the independence debate’
– Eiser, D. and Comerford, D. (2013) ‘Constitutional change and
inequality in Scotland ‘
– Eiser, D. ‘Inequality’ in ‘The Economic Consequences of Scottish
Independence’ Beckmann, K., Bell, D.N.F. and Eiser, D. (eds), Helmut-
SchmidtUniversität / Universität der Bundeswehr , Hamburg
Editor's Notes
Chart shows weekly earnings inequality.
An individual in top 1% now earns 20 times more than someone in bottom 1%, compared to 17 times in 1997. Individual in top 1% now earns 6 times more than median, compared to 5 times in 1997. But bottom 1% has slightly closed gap to median (3.6 to 3.2).
Small changes to tax/ benefit policy unlikely to have major impacts on net income inequality; need a 5 pp decrease in GINI to reach Nordic levels
Living wage reduces overall inequality, but increases gap between median and lower half of the income distribution