SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 22
Power, advice and the ‘Acton Principle’:
      Does ‘All power corrupt’?
What is the impact of having power on how
people behave? Does ‘power corrupt’? Here is
some evidence from the published research …
Powerful people … 1




….are less affected by the judgments of others’
when making decisions—which is double
edged, depending on how good their
judgement and ‘intel’ are;
Powerful people … 2




… benefit from power at the cognitive level—
they stay more goal focused and have better
‘executive function’ than the less powerful (and
it isn’t that these factors lead to getting power)
Powerful people … 3



… can reach good
decisions under
pressure both by ‘gut
feel’ and reason. Less
powerful people
match on ‘gut feel’ but
not the reasoning.
(see further below on
‘taking advice’.)
People given power in lab experiments are

                       • more likely to rely on
                         stereotypes when judging
                         others;
                       • pay less attention to the
                         characteristics that define
                         those other people as
                         individuals;
                       • predisposed to stereotype,
                         they also judge others'
                         attitudes, interests, and needs
                         less accurately;
                       • believe they have control over
                         events even when they don’t
                         (“illusory control”—see below)
They are also likely to …




•   flirt in more direct fashion
•   make risky choices and gambles
•   make first offers in negotiations
•   physically touch others in potentially
    inappropriate ways;
•   speak their mind, and
•   eat cookies like the Cookie Monster, with
    crumbs all over their chins and chests.
High-power individuals are more likely to



        •   interrupt others;
        •   speak out of turn;
        •   fail to look at others who are
            speaking;
        •   tease friends and colleagues
            in hostile, humiliating
            fashion;
        •   compensate—if they feel
            incompetent—by bullying
            subordinates and being
            aggressive.
Overall, having power lets people…




•   become more focused on their own needs
    and wants;
•   become less focused on others’ needs,
    wants, and actions; and
•   act as if written and unwritten rules that
    others are expected to follow don’t apply
    to them
People with power tend to behave
like patients who have damaged
their brain's orbitofrontal lobes … a
condition that seems to cause
overly impulsive and insensitive
behaviour. Thus the experience of
power might be thought of as
having someone open up your skull
and take out that part of your brain
so critical to empathy and socially-
appropriate behaviour.

Prof. Dacher Keltner
Many bosses suffer a form of
power poisoning: They believe
that they are aware of every
important development in the
organization (even when they
are remarkably ignorant of key
facts). This affliction is called
“the fallacy of centrality”—the
assumption that because one
holds a central position, one
automatically knows everything
necessary to exercise effective
leadership.
Is this ‘corruption’?


Corruption may be too strong a word. But these
results clearly show that having power (real or in
a simulation) readily leads towards behaviour
patterns, many of them unreflective, which
allow people to do things they would not
approve of/ like were they subject to these
behaviours from others.
Illusory control …
appears to be a generative cause
of and driving force behind a
number of effects previously
found to be associated with
power, including
action, optimism, and self-
esteem.
This shed lights on why the
powerful often seem to exhibit
hubristic overconfidence.
By producing an illusion of
personal control, power may
cause people to lose touch with
reality in ways that lead to
overconfident decision making.
High self-esteem is the cause of poor decision-making


"People are afraid to admit they
are wrong, so they pour more time
and resources into a lost cause.
They are afraid to look bad by
failing, so they engage in self-
handicapping, which increases the
likelihood of failure. They avoid
taking a chance in order to prevent
a possible rejection“

Baumeister, Roy F. (1997) ‘Esteem Threat, Self-Regulatory Breakdown,
and Emotional Distress as Factors in Self-Defeating Behavior’, Review
of General Psychology VoL 1. No. 2, 145-174
Do the powerful take advice? From whom?
       Under what circumstances?
People offered advice…

• Under value it on easy
  tasks and over value it on
  difficult tasks.
• Are more responsive to it
  from older, better
  educated, wiser, or more
  experienced advisors.
• Take more notice of
  confident advisors
• Take more notice of good
  quality advice (but still
  may ignore it!)
Overconfidence
impacts on
status
and being
listened to …


     • overconfidence predicts higher status in groups
     • overconfident members are the ones who speak the most
       often, use a confident tone, give the most information, and
       come across as calm and relaxed. These individuals are also
       more convincing in displays of ability than other members who
       are highly competent.
The type of problem affects accepting advice:

       • When a task is intellective (‘cut and dried’ with a right
         answer) advice is accepted from anyone based on
         expertise, accuracy and being ‘right’
       • When a task is more a ‘judgement’ (ethical, ‘best
         guess’, etc.) people rely on advice from the social majority
         who support each other rather than any ‘minority’
Taking personal advice or not:
                                    When facing judgments
                                    about their own
                                    behaviour, people weigh
                                    information from similar
                                    advisors more than
                                    information from dissimilar
                                    advisors.



However, when facing judgments
about others’ behaviour, people
weigh information from dissimilar
advisors more than similar
advisors.
Rosy glasses or red haze?




In an experiment where people were primed with gratitude (+), anger
(-) or neither (0):

+ led to increased trust, accepting advice and increased task accuracy;
- led to decreased trust, ignoring advice and decreased task accuracy;
0 sat in between these
So, does power corrupt?


Maybe not as an absolute rule, but possession
of power in real situations and simulations
consistently offers strong temptations and
chances to behave unwisely and / or shamefully.
To resist this requires both insight and good
character.

More Related Content

What's hot

Rising above inferiority complex
Rising above inferiority complexRising above inferiority complex
Rising above inferiority complexNYOKABIJESSE
 
Why good-people-do-bad-things
Why good-people-do-bad-thingsWhy good-people-do-bad-things
Why good-people-do-bad-thingsNOELFORMOSO
 
Unconscious Bias: Awareness and Action
Unconscious Bias: Awareness and ActionUnconscious Bias: Awareness and Action
Unconscious Bias: Awareness and ActionRotary International
 
Aronson 6e ch4_perception
Aronson 6e ch4_perceptionAronson 6e ch4_perception
Aronson 6e ch4_perceptionmrkramek
 
Aronson 6e ch3_cognition
Aronson 6e ch3_cognitionAronson 6e ch3_cognition
Aronson 6e ch3_cognitionmrkramek
 
Power in interpersonal relationships
Power in interpersonal relationshipsPower in interpersonal relationships
Power in interpersonal relationshipsLaras Mukti
 
Sense of the self in the world
Sense of the self in the worldSense of the self in the world
Sense of the self in the worldMehran Rostamzadeh
 
Chapter 3-conscience-the-self-in-search-of-the-good-2333
Chapter 3-conscience-the-self-in-search-of-the-good-2333Chapter 3-conscience-the-self-in-search-of-the-good-2333
Chapter 3-conscience-the-self-in-search-of-the-good-2333Mark Sheran Leosala
 
Aronson 6e ch7_attitudes
Aronson 6e ch7_attitudesAronson 6e ch7_attitudes
Aronson 6e ch7_attitudesmrkramek
 
Chapter3thornock2015
Chapter3thornock2015Chapter3thornock2015
Chapter3thornock2015RThornock
 
Aronson 6e ch1_intro
Aronson 6e ch1_introAronson 6e ch1_intro
Aronson 6e ch1_intromrkramek
 

What's hot (20)

Social psychology
Social psychologySocial psychology
Social psychology
 
10 social
10  social10  social
10 social
 
Rising above inferiority complex
Rising above inferiority complexRising above inferiority complex
Rising above inferiority complex
 
Social influence
Social influenceSocial influence
Social influence
 
Why good-people-do-bad-things
Why good-people-do-bad-thingsWhy good-people-do-bad-things
Why good-people-do-bad-things
 
List of cognitive biases
List of cognitive biasesList of cognitive biases
List of cognitive biases
 
The Blame Game Culture at Work with Ben Dattner
The Blame Game Culture at Work with Ben DattnerThe Blame Game Culture at Work with Ben Dattner
The Blame Game Culture at Work with Ben Dattner
 
Elliot aronson
Elliot aronsonElliot aronson
Elliot aronson
 
Unconscious Bias: Awareness and Action
Unconscious Bias: Awareness and ActionUnconscious Bias: Awareness and Action
Unconscious Bias: Awareness and Action
 
Aronson 6e ch4_perception
Aronson 6e ch4_perceptionAronson 6e ch4_perception
Aronson 6e ch4_perception
 
Aronson 6e ch3_cognition
Aronson 6e ch3_cognitionAronson 6e ch3_cognition
Aronson 6e ch3_cognition
 
Power in interpersonal relationships
Power in interpersonal relationshipsPower in interpersonal relationships
Power in interpersonal relationships
 
Slide skpotvin.witimpostersyndrome
Slide skpotvin.witimpostersyndromeSlide skpotvin.witimpostersyndrome
Slide skpotvin.witimpostersyndrome
 
Sense of the self in the world
Sense of the self in the worldSense of the self in the world
Sense of the self in the world
 
Chapter 3-conscience-the-self-in-search-of-the-good-2333
Chapter 3-conscience-the-self-in-search-of-the-good-2333Chapter 3-conscience-the-self-in-search-of-the-good-2333
Chapter 3-conscience-the-self-in-search-of-the-good-2333
 
Aronson 6e ch7_attitudes
Aronson 6e ch7_attitudesAronson 6e ch7_attitudes
Aronson 6e ch7_attitudes
 
Change
ChangeChange
Change
 
Chapter3thornock2015
Chapter3thornock2015Chapter3thornock2015
Chapter3thornock2015
 
Aronson 6e ch1_intro
Aronson 6e ch1_introAronson 6e ch1_intro
Aronson 6e ch1_intro
 
Perception and the Self
Perception and the SelfPerception and the Self
Perception and the Self
 

Similar to The acton principle

Self-Deception
Self-Deception Self-Deception
Self-Deception bhatt7
 
35 strategies for critical thinking
35 strategies for critical thinking35 strategies for critical thinking
35 strategies for critical thinkingIrina K
 
Sizing people Up
Sizing people UpSizing people Up
Sizing people Upvikram sood
 
Making ethical decisions
Making ethical decisionsMaking ethical decisions
Making ethical decisionsrstrickland6
 
Social Psychology
Social PsychologySocial Psychology
Social PsychologyAlex Holub
 
PPT-Design-in-BIO-PSYCHO-2.pptx
PPT-Design-in-BIO-PSYCHO-2.pptxPPT-Design-in-BIO-PSYCHO-2.pptx
PPT-Design-in-BIO-PSYCHO-2.pptxYhanAcol
 
Personality
PersonalityPersonality
Personalityovehamza
 
~ The five personality factor theory ~
~ The five personality factor theory ~~ The five personality factor theory ~
~ The five personality factor theory ~Prabhleen Arora
 
How (Un)Ethical Are YouMost of us believe that we are ethi
How (Un)Ethical Are YouMost of us believe that we are ethiHow (Un)Ethical Are YouMost of us believe that we are ethi
How (Un)Ethical Are YouMost of us believe that we are ethiLizbethQuinonez813
 
Chapter 5 presentation
Chapter 5 presentationChapter 5 presentation
Chapter 5 presentationAmanda Short
 
Introduction to unconscious bias
Introduction to unconscious biasIntroduction to unconscious bias
Introduction to unconscious biasKaren M. Landolt
 
Marli Gregory PROFILE
Marli Gregory PROFILEMarli Gregory PROFILE
Marli Gregory PROFILEMarli Gregory
 
Unconscious vs. Conscious Leader - FINAL
Unconscious vs. Conscious Leader - FINALUnconscious vs. Conscious Leader - FINAL
Unconscious vs. Conscious Leader - FINALColin Tong
 

Similar to The acton principle (20)

Unbalancing Distortions in the Belief System
Unbalancing Distortions in the Belief SystemUnbalancing Distortions in the Belief System
Unbalancing Distortions in the Belief System
 
Self-Deception
Self-Deception Self-Deception
Self-Deception
 
35 strategies for critical thinking
35 strategies for critical thinking35 strategies for critical thinking
35 strategies for critical thinking
 
Learnings from how
Learnings from howLearnings from how
Learnings from how
 
Sizing people Up
Sizing people UpSizing people Up
Sizing people Up
 
Making ethical decisions
Making ethical decisionsMaking ethical decisions
Making ethical decisions
 
Social Psychology
Social PsychologySocial Psychology
Social Psychology
 
Spiritual Abuse I
Spiritual Abuse ISpiritual Abuse I
Spiritual Abuse I
 
PPT-Design-in-BIO-PSYCHO-2.pptx
PPT-Design-in-BIO-PSYCHO-2.pptxPPT-Design-in-BIO-PSYCHO-2.pptx
PPT-Design-in-BIO-PSYCHO-2.pptx
 
Personality
PersonalityPersonality
Personality
 
~ The five personality factor theory ~
~ The five personality factor theory ~~ The five personality factor theory ~
~ The five personality factor theory ~
 
How (Un)Ethical Are YouMost of us believe that we are ethi
How (Un)Ethical Are YouMost of us believe that we are ethiHow (Un)Ethical Are YouMost of us believe that we are ethi
How (Un)Ethical Are YouMost of us believe that we are ethi
 
Personality
PersonalityPersonality
Personality
 
Chapter 5 presentation
Chapter 5 presentationChapter 5 presentation
Chapter 5 presentation
 
Introduction to unconscious bias
Introduction to unconscious biasIntroduction to unconscious bias
Introduction to unconscious bias
 
Marli Gregory PROFILE
Marli Gregory PROFILEMarli Gregory PROFILE
Marli Gregory PROFILE
 
Social perception & attribution
Social perception & attributionSocial perception & attribution
Social perception & attribution
 
Unconscious vs. Conscious Leader - FINAL
Unconscious vs. Conscious Leader - FINALUnconscious vs. Conscious Leader - FINAL
Unconscious vs. Conscious Leader - FINAL
 
BRM.pptx
BRM.pptxBRM.pptx
BRM.pptx
 
Family Systems Theory in Congregational Life
Family Systems Theory in Congregational LifeFamily Systems Theory in Congregational Life
Family Systems Theory in Congregational Life
 

More from Stephen Mugford

A tiny minority are most of the risk
A tiny minority are most of the riskA tiny minority are most of the risk
A tiny minority are most of the riskStephen Mugford
 
The cracks are more visible online. why virtual interaction is more complex t...
The cracks are more visible online. why virtual interaction is more complex t...The cracks are more visible online. why virtual interaction is more complex t...
The cracks are more visible online. why virtual interaction is more complex t...Stephen Mugford
 
Building adaptive capacity in hierarchical organisations
Building adaptive capacity in hierarchical organisationsBuilding adaptive capacity in hierarchical organisations
Building adaptive capacity in hierarchical organisationsStephen Mugford
 
How senior leadership teams do or don
How senior leadership teams do or donHow senior leadership teams do or don
How senior leadership teams do or donStephen Mugford
 
Reintegration ceremonies revisited (2)
Reintegration ceremonies revisited (2)Reintegration ceremonies revisited (2)
Reintegration ceremonies revisited (2)Stephen Mugford
 
Group size, dialog and high quality participation
Group size, dialog and high quality participationGroup size, dialog and high quality participation
Group size, dialog and high quality participationStephen Mugford
 

More from Stephen Mugford (9)

A tiny minority are most of the risk
A tiny minority are most of the riskA tiny minority are most of the risk
A tiny minority are most of the risk
 
The cracks are more visible online. why virtual interaction is more complex t...
The cracks are more visible online. why virtual interaction is more complex t...The cracks are more visible online. why virtual interaction is more complex t...
The cracks are more visible online. why virtual interaction is more complex t...
 
Poised in paradox
Poised in paradoxPoised in paradox
Poised in paradox
 
Why walking works
Why walking worksWhy walking works
Why walking works
 
Building adaptive capacity in hierarchical organisations
Building adaptive capacity in hierarchical organisationsBuilding adaptive capacity in hierarchical organisations
Building adaptive capacity in hierarchical organisations
 
How senior leadership teams do or don
How senior leadership teams do or donHow senior leadership teams do or don
How senior leadership teams do or don
 
Reintegration ceremonies revisited (2)
Reintegration ceremonies revisited (2)Reintegration ceremonies revisited (2)
Reintegration ceremonies revisited (2)
 
Group size, dialog and high quality participation
Group size, dialog and high quality participationGroup size, dialog and high quality participation
Group size, dialog and high quality participation
 
Butterfly paper
Butterfly paperButterfly paper
Butterfly paper
 

The acton principle

  • 1. Power, advice and the ‘Acton Principle’: Does ‘All power corrupt’?
  • 2. What is the impact of having power on how people behave? Does ‘power corrupt’? Here is some evidence from the published research …
  • 3. Powerful people … 1 ….are less affected by the judgments of others’ when making decisions—which is double edged, depending on how good their judgement and ‘intel’ are;
  • 4. Powerful people … 2 … benefit from power at the cognitive level— they stay more goal focused and have better ‘executive function’ than the less powerful (and it isn’t that these factors lead to getting power)
  • 5. Powerful people … 3 … can reach good decisions under pressure both by ‘gut feel’ and reason. Less powerful people match on ‘gut feel’ but not the reasoning. (see further below on ‘taking advice’.)
  • 6. People given power in lab experiments are • more likely to rely on stereotypes when judging others; • pay less attention to the characteristics that define those other people as individuals; • predisposed to stereotype, they also judge others' attitudes, interests, and needs less accurately; • believe they have control over events even when they don’t (“illusory control”—see below)
  • 7. They are also likely to … • flirt in more direct fashion • make risky choices and gambles • make first offers in negotiations • physically touch others in potentially inappropriate ways; • speak their mind, and • eat cookies like the Cookie Monster, with crumbs all over their chins and chests.
  • 8. High-power individuals are more likely to • interrupt others; • speak out of turn; • fail to look at others who are speaking; • tease friends and colleagues in hostile, humiliating fashion; • compensate—if they feel incompetent—by bullying subordinates and being aggressive.
  • 9. Overall, having power lets people… • become more focused on their own needs and wants; • become less focused on others’ needs, wants, and actions; and • act as if written and unwritten rules that others are expected to follow don’t apply to them
  • 10. People with power tend to behave like patients who have damaged their brain's orbitofrontal lobes … a condition that seems to cause overly impulsive and insensitive behaviour. Thus the experience of power might be thought of as having someone open up your skull and take out that part of your brain so critical to empathy and socially- appropriate behaviour. Prof. Dacher Keltner
  • 11. Many bosses suffer a form of power poisoning: They believe that they are aware of every important development in the organization (even when they are remarkably ignorant of key facts). This affliction is called “the fallacy of centrality”—the assumption that because one holds a central position, one automatically knows everything necessary to exercise effective leadership.
  • 12. Is this ‘corruption’? Corruption may be too strong a word. But these results clearly show that having power (real or in a simulation) readily leads towards behaviour patterns, many of them unreflective, which allow people to do things they would not approve of/ like were they subject to these behaviours from others.
  • 13. Illusory control … appears to be a generative cause of and driving force behind a number of effects previously found to be associated with power, including action, optimism, and self- esteem. This shed lights on why the powerful often seem to exhibit hubristic overconfidence. By producing an illusion of personal control, power may cause people to lose touch with reality in ways that lead to overconfident decision making.
  • 14. High self-esteem is the cause of poor decision-making "People are afraid to admit they are wrong, so they pour more time and resources into a lost cause. They are afraid to look bad by failing, so they engage in self- handicapping, which increases the likelihood of failure. They avoid taking a chance in order to prevent a possible rejection“ Baumeister, Roy F. (1997) ‘Esteem Threat, Self-Regulatory Breakdown, and Emotional Distress as Factors in Self-Defeating Behavior’, Review of General Psychology VoL 1. No. 2, 145-174
  • 15. Do the powerful take advice? From whom? Under what circumstances?
  • 16. People offered advice… • Under value it on easy tasks and over value it on difficult tasks. • Are more responsive to it from older, better educated, wiser, or more experienced advisors. • Take more notice of confident advisors • Take more notice of good quality advice (but still may ignore it!)
  • 17.
  • 18. Overconfidence impacts on status and being listened to … • overconfidence predicts higher status in groups • overconfident members are the ones who speak the most often, use a confident tone, give the most information, and come across as calm and relaxed. These individuals are also more convincing in displays of ability than other members who are highly competent.
  • 19. The type of problem affects accepting advice: • When a task is intellective (‘cut and dried’ with a right answer) advice is accepted from anyone based on expertise, accuracy and being ‘right’ • When a task is more a ‘judgement’ (ethical, ‘best guess’, etc.) people rely on advice from the social majority who support each other rather than any ‘minority’
  • 20. Taking personal advice or not: When facing judgments about their own behaviour, people weigh information from similar advisors more than information from dissimilar advisors. However, when facing judgments about others’ behaviour, people weigh information from dissimilar advisors more than similar advisors.
  • 21. Rosy glasses or red haze? In an experiment where people were primed with gratitude (+), anger (-) or neither (0): + led to increased trust, accepting advice and increased task accuracy; - led to decreased trust, ignoring advice and decreased task accuracy; 0 sat in between these
  • 22. So, does power corrupt? Maybe not as an absolute rule, but possession of power in real situations and simulations consistently offers strong temptations and chances to behave unwisely and / or shamefully. To resist this requires both insight and good character.