Corruption Perception Index 2010
•Download as PPT, PDF•
2 likes•733 views
CPI2010 is an aggregate indicator that… 1. Measures the degree to which corruption is perceived to exist among public officials and politicians in 178 countries around the world. 2. Focuses on perceptions and not hard data 3. Draws on 13 different surveys and country assessments from 10 independent institutions carried out among experienced observers, such as business people and country analysts, including local experts.
Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (20)
Viewers also liked
Viewers also liked (11)
Similar to Corruption Perception Index 2010
Similar to Corruption Perception Index 2010 (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (10)
Corruption Perception Index 2010
- 1. www.transparency.org/cpi Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index 2010 Policy and Research Department Communications Department TI –Secretariat 19 October, 2010
- 2. TI Corruption Perceptions Index 2010 • What is the CPI 2010? • Objectives • Methodology • Sources • Sampling • Country coverage • Results and explaining changes • Please remember… • New materials in 2010 • Launch of the CPI 2010
- 3. What is the CPI 2010? An aggregate indicator that… • Measures the degree to which corruption is perceived to exist among public officials and politicians in 178 countries around the world. • Focuses on perceptions and not hard data • Draws on 13 different surveys and country assessments from 10 independent institutions carried out among experienced observers, such as business people and country analysts, including local experts.
- 4. Objectives • To enhance comparative understanding of levels of public sector corruption. • To create public awareness of corruption – and create a climate for change. • To offer a snapshot of the views of businesspeople and experts who make decisions about trade and investment. • To stimulate scientific research and complementary diagnostic analysis on causes and consequences of corruption, both at international and national level.
- 5. Methodology The CPI is an indicator that combines different sources of information on perceived levels of corruption • 13 surveys from 10 institutions (different sampling and varying methodologies) • All sources of information assess levels of corruption mainly, in the public sector. Some sources of information contribute with more detailed data, thus simple averages must be calculated prior to inclusion. • Country scores on a scale from 10 (very clean) to 0 (very corrupt). • At least 3 sources per country. Businesspeople opinion surveys cover last 2 years while for assessments made by experts only the most recent iteration is included. • For more details, see one page methodology document or detailed methodology document www.transparency.org/cpi
- 6. Sources • Asian Development Bank (ADB), Country Performance Assessment Ratings, 2009 • African Development Bank (AfDB), Country Policy and Institutional Assessment, 2009 • Bertelsmann Foundation (BF), Bertelsmann Transformation Index, 2009 • The Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU), Country Risk Service and Country Forecast, 2010 • Freedom House (FH), Nations in Transit, 2010 • Global Insight (formerly the World Markets Research Centre, GI), Risk Ratings, 2010 • The Institute for Management Development (IMD) Lausanne, World Competitiveness Yearbook, 2009 and 2010 • The Political and Economic Risk Consultancy, (PERC) Hong Kong, Asian Intelligence Newsletter, 2009 and 2010 • World Economic Forum (WEF), Global Competitiveness Report, 2009 and 2010 • World Bank (WB), Country Policy and Institutional Assessment 2009
- 7. Sampling Source Sample 1 ADB, AFDB, BTI, EIU, GI, WB Non-resident perspective; respondents largely from developed countries of the western hemisphere. 2 FH, IMD, PERC, and WEF Resident perspective; respondents from local experts and local business and multinational firms. Composition of respondents is approximately 60 percent non-residents and 40 percent residents
- 8. Coverage The CPI 2010 covers 178 countries/territories (2 less than in 2009). Change resulted from individual sources adjusting their coverage: Kosovo is included for the first time this year. Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, and Suriname, are not included in the CPI 2010.
- 9. Results -- CPI 2010 Rank Country Score Surveys used 1 Denmark 9.3 6 1 New Zealand 9.3 6 1 Singapore 9.3 9 4 Finland 9.2 6 Sweden 9.2 6 Rank Country Score Surveys used 175 Iraq 1.5 3 176 Afghanistan 1.4 4 Myanmar 1.4 3 178 Somalia 1.1 3 Countries where corruption is perceived to be lowest Countries where corruption is perceived to be highest
- 10. Changes in results 2010 v. 2009 The CPI should not be used to compare across editions. Scores from original sources were used to identify countries for which perceptions of the prevalence of corruption changed. Changes in scores that can be identified in the sources themselves: • Decliners 2009 to 2010: The Czech Republic, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Madagascar, Niger and the United States. • Improvers 2009 to 2010: Bhutan, Chile, Ecuador, FYR Macedonia, Gambia, Haiti, Jamaica, Kuwait, and Qatar
- 11. How to explain year-to-year changes • Some changes in score are result of an observable change in perceived levels of corruption • In 2010 some changes are result of: • Changes in sources: There is a change in countries covered by the original sources or some sources are not longer used. • Rounding and standardizing of data.
- 12. Please remember… • The CPI SCORE indicates the perceived level of corruption in a country and the RANK indicates its position relative to the other countries included in the index. • CPI needs complementary analysis. Need other measures to understand WHY a country scores as it does. • The CPI was not designed to measure change over time. It is also not meant to provide a view of most recent efforts/changes. • The CPI was not designed to identify areas for reform– NIS or other tools are better suited to do this • The countries who score and rank poorly are not the most corrupt in the world. • Although the CPI is robust, it should not be used as a hard measure for aid allocation.
- 13. New in 2010! • Along with the CPI table, the following accompanying materials will be available – Underlying scores: The scores given to a country by 9 of the 13 different data providers (sources). These scores are transformed from their original scores to the 0 to 10 scale the CPI uses. – Description of data sources: A summary document explaining for each source of information: institutional features, type of survey, respondents, questions and scoring guidelines – CPI report: Booklet presenting the CPI results
- 14. What is new in 2010? Underlying scores.. For the first time ever, the CPI country scores are being published along with 9 of the 13 underlying assessments used to calculate the index: 1 Denmark 9.3 # 9.2 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.2 1 New Zealand 9.3 # 9.2 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 1 Singapore 9.3 9.3 # 9.2 9.3 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.3 9.5 4 Finland 9.2 # 9.2 9.5 9.4 9.2 9.1 4 Sweden 9.2 # 9.2 9.2 9.3 9.5 9.4 6 Canada 8.9 # 9.2 8.9 8.8 8.4 8.9 7 Netherlands 8.8 # 9.2 9.0 8.9 8.6 8.5 8 Australia 8.7 # 9.2 9.2 9.1 8.4 8.9 7.5 8.3 8 Switzerland 8.7 # 7.4 9.1 9.1 8.9 9.0 10 Norway 8.6 # 7.4 8.1 8.4 9.1 9.3 11 Iceland 8.5 # 9.2 7.9 9.2 9.1 11 Luxembourg 8.5 7.4 8.6 9.0 9.0 8.4 13 Hong Kong 8.4 # 7.4 8.4 8.2 8.9 8.4 7.9 8.9 14 Ireland 8.0 # 7.4 7.9 8.0 7.9 8.0 15 Austria 7.9 # 7.4 8.1 8.9 8.4 7.9 15 Germany 7.9 # 7.4 7.5 8.1 8.1 7.2 17 Barbados 7.8 # 7.4 6.8 8.1 17 Japan 7.8 # 7.4 7.5 8.5 7.5 7.7 8.1 8.8 19 Qatar 7.7 4.5 # 9.2 8.4 8.3 9.1 7.6 20 United Kingdom 7.6 # 7.4 7.9 7.7 7.5 8.2 21 Chile 7.2 7.0 # 7.4 6.9 7.3 7.1 7.7 GI2010 IMD2009 IMD2010 CountryRank CPI2010Score Country / Territory AfDB2009 BF2009 EIU2010 FH2010 PERC2009 PERC2010 WB2009 WEF2009 WEF2010 ADB2009
- 15. What is new in 2010? Underlying scores & CPI report CPI ReportTI 2010 Corruption Perceptions Index: Sources of Information • About the institution • Who provides the assessment? • Guidelines used • What questions were used in the 2010 CPI? • How were these questions scored? • Number of countries/territories covered • Timeline • Website
- 16. Messages • Response to global crises must prioritise zero tolerance for corruption • Three-quarters of the 178 countries surveyed scored below 5, highlighting that corruption remains a serious problem • To address challenges of failing financial markets, climate change, and poverty governments need to integrate anti-corruption measures in all policy spheres. • Good governance is an essential part of the solution to the global policy challenges governments face
- 17. Press Materials • For distribution: • CPI report (English and French printed; Arabic, English, French, Mandarin, Russian Spanish web-only) • Poster with map, index and graphic (English) • Frequently Asked Questions (all languages, web only) • Detailed Sources (English, web only)
- 18. International Launch • “Virtual Launch”, 26 October – No press conference, but – Video message of Huguette Labelle, Chair broadcasted on TI‘s website – Video message of Robin Hodess, Director of Policy and Research Department broadcasted on TI‘s website – Audio/video messages highlighting regional results in various languages and broadcasted on TI‘s website – Web-interactive world map presenting the results visually – In Focus gathering all materials – Channelling discussions and comments through TI‘s blog, TI‘s Twitter account, TI‘s Facebook network and through opinion polls and surveys
- 19. CPI 2010 Map
- 21. www.transparency.org/cpi Thank you We welcome your questions Policy and Research Department Communications Department
Editor's Notes
- The pernicious effects of corruption damage all aspects of life and society.
- Hard data difficult to obtain and validity to be an indicator of the underlying phenomenon might be questionable e.g. comparing number of prosecutions or court cases…
- The pernicious effects of corruption damage all aspects of life and society.
- The pernicious effects of corruption damage all aspects of life and society.
- The pernicious effects of corruption damage all aspects of life and society.
- The pernicious effects of corruption damage all aspects of life and society.
- The pernicious effects of corruption damage all aspects of life and society.