The document provides an overview of campaign finance and discusses why campaign contributions are important to politicians as they buy access and influence. It notes that large contributions from groups like Verizon executives were given to a politician in a coordinated manner. Similar donation patterns exist at the state and local levels where large donors receive access and government contracts. Disclosure rules are often circumvented through various political pockets like PACs, non-profits, and family members. While some see money as inconsequential, others view it as decisive in politics. The truth is complex as it falls along a continuum.
2. Why is this stuff so important?
Politicians do notice
campaign
contributors
That doesn’t mean
it buys votes, but it
does buy access and
the opportunity to
persuade an elected
politician to see
things your way
3. How to get attention
“Top Verizon executives, including CEO Ivan Seidenberg
and President Dennis Strigl, wrote personal checks to
Rockefeller totaling $23,500 in March, 2007. Prior to that
apparently coordinated flurry of 29 donations, only one
of those executives had ever donated to Rockefeller (at
least while working for Verizon).”
4. Happens at state level…
You may recall Gov. Rick
Perry
Texas Tech fund
rewarded donors
They gave in $32K-$310K
range
They got millions back
5. …and at the local level
Donors gave Kasim Reed
campaign contributions
Insiders raised money for
Reed’s mayoral campaign
Airport concessions
awarded to…
Big donors to Reed’s
campaign
Big fundraisers for
Reed’s campaign
6. Multiple means to exert influence
Hire former staffers as
lobbyists
Hire former lawmakers,
councilmen, etc.
Contribute to inaugural events
Give money to lawmaker
charities
Give to super PACs
Hire relatives of elected
officials
7. Politicians have lots of pockets
Campaigns
Parties
Leadership PACs
Nonprofits
Businesses & investments
Super PACs
Family members
8. Businesses “pick the pocket”
Lots of places to look
We’ll suggest some
resources
Not all this money can be
traced
Sometimes, you need
sources
9. Two different perspectives on
this
Money is inconsequential Money is decisive
Contributors give to Presidential campaigns are
lawmakers because of the auctions; Congress is a big
member’s positions (Phil flea market with all sorts of
Gramm and NRA) bric-a-brac policies on sale
Truth is always somewhere along
the continuum between the two
10. “When elected officials solicit these
contributions from interests who almost
always have matters pending before the
Congress, [they] become at least
psychologically beholden to those who
contribute. It is inevitable and unavoidable.”
--William Brock, former Senator, former RNC
Chairman
11. That doesn’t mean…
That all politicians are
bought and paid for
Very few make up bribe
menus like the one to the
right
But politicians tend to
grant more access to big
contributors than non
contributors, and their
views and actions
sometimes reflect this
12. Bank of America increased
the interest rate on Bonnie
Rushing’s credit card from
8 percent to 23 percent.
Sen. Thomas Carper: “But
let me just ask you -- put
yourself in the shoes of the
credit card company…”
13. And how do the credit
card companies feel
about Sen. Tom Carper?
Rushing’s monthly
interest bill went from
about $150 to $674
Small change to a U.S.
Senator’s campaign
committee…
15. So before we go further into the
fun stuff, let’s look at the rules…
Federal elections have one set of
rules (and multiple sets of
resources for following the
money)
State elections have 50 separate
sets or rules (one for each state)
Some local jurisdictions have
rules specific to them (sometimes
dependent on state law)
16. In Colorado, corporate and labor donors are banned, except
when they aren’t
Colorado Springs is the largest home rule municipality in
Colorado
17. Let’s focus on Federal rules.
Individuals can donate…
(inflation adjusted) (not inflation adjusted)
Up to $2,500 per election Up to $5,000 to a Political
to a candidate, that is, Action Committee per year
$2,500 for the primary, $10,000 to state, district &
$2,500 for the general local party committee (for
$30,800 to a national party use in federal elections,
committee (RNC, DCCC, that is) (combined limit)
etc.) Unlimited amount to super
Up to $117,000 every two PAC for eligible U.S. donors
years to PACs, parties,
candidates…
18. …but potentially a lot more if
they have a lot of friends
Bundlers put together
networks of donors, all of
whom can write $500,
$1,000 or $2,500 checks
to campaigns
They are much more
important to presidential
campaigns, but members
of Congress also rely on
them
19. Can also give unlimited amounts
to 527s, 501cs and super PACS
All three have
separate rules
501cs don’t disclose
527s avoid some
activities
Super PACs disclose
but have few
restrictions
Candidates can raise
money for super PACs
Most giving so far has
been individual
20. Big trend from 2008?
Rise of the small
donor
Contributions under
$200 don’t have to
be itemized
Campaigns must still
keep donor lists for
small donors, subject
to FEC audit
21. Worth remembering…
Unitemized=less than $200
Obama’s totals very similar
to Bush ’04
Congress relies more on big
donors
Big money still decisive
22. Small donors get a raffle…
$5 donors offered dinner
w/Obamas
Good technique for
attracting small donors
Did it in 2008 too
But unlike the lottery…
23. Big donors get access
Donors who give to
Obama & DNC get
access
It’s not like spending
$35,000 on lottery
tickets
Lotteries are more
honest…
24. Bigger trends from 2008?
Bundlers are bigger than ever
They operate at the
presidential, congressional
and state level (probably
local too…)
No requirement that their
identities be disclosed,
except…
25. As part of the Honest
Leadership and Open
Government Act of 2007
Registered lobbyists must
disclose the bundling of
contributions they do for
federal candidates
Applies to individuals
they bring to fundraisers,
PACs they control or
persuade to contribute
All bundles over $16,200
are reported.
26. Easy to defeat disclosure
We see tons of invites like
this one
Hosts commit to raise money
Vast majority don’t show up
as bundlers
Even when they’re lobbyists
27. What a business can do
Form (and pay
expenses of) a political
action committee
PACs can contribute
$5,000 per election (i.e.,
primary, general) to a
candidate; $15,000 to a
national party
committee; $5,000 to
state, district or local
parties per year; $5,000
to other PACs per year
Funds must be
“segregated” from other
corporate money
28. Note this language…
Where are corporations like ExxonMobil and
Imperial Oil, and labor unions as well, making
contributions?
31. …and to Super PACs
Mostly individual donors
Few businesses show up
But individuals run
companies
Have interests before
gov’t
32. Hire lobbyists
Lobbyists get access
This page is beautiful
Shows wining and dining
Lobbyists are also
contributors
33. Donate to inaugural committees
All states have different
rules
Sometimes donors can
give more
Enron gave lots to
Bush’s inaugural
committee
34. Pay for junkets
Not always easy to
trace
Disclosure for
Congress, Executive
Branch
States, localities vary
35. Where do you get information?
Federal
State
Primary
Primary
FEC.gov
State election
House Clerk
authorities
Secretary of Senate
State ethics commissions
Secondary
IRE has a resource for
OpenSecrets.org finding them
InfluenceExplorer.com Secondary
NICAR Followthemoney.org
NY Times InfluenceExplorer.com
ProPublica.org
Wall St. Journal
36. www.FEC.gov
Clunky
Getting
better
Still not
perfect
Original
source of
data
37. Useful features
Presidential election map Congressional election
with zip coded map with downloadable
contributions files for every candidate
38. Other features
Clunky search engine
Ability to see raw
paper reports
Download huge data
files
Enforcement, press
releases, other data
Explanations of
campaign finance law
42. Tons of data…
Federal candidates
1987 to present
Pacs 1997 to present
Lobbying 1998 to
present
Trips, financial
disclosure and much
more…
You can buy custom
slices of data from
them
51. National Institute on Money in State
Politics
Like CRP, they
industry code
contributions
Covers all 50
states
They always run
a bit behind
raw state
disclosures